Re: 'Resentment' Herman?, try being white.

Date: 3rd May '01

Name: Tweety

'Promoting racial differences dosen't necessarily mean a lack of equality'. Not 'neccesarily'? In other words it's a possibility. That must be very encouraging news for the boys in AFA who boast of battering bludgeoing booting British nationalism into submission. After all AFA's endeavour, good old Herman Ouesley can say in all sincerity:

'Thanks chaps for all your help in freeing society of nasty fascists, thus allowing society with good conscience to set about establishing a pecking order based on race, except, and here's the kinky bit, - whitey won't be on top.

Well, ...I mean... not necessarily!'

'And remember, even if that's how it turns out anyway, I and my fellow careerists like Lee Jasper will have made a bloody good living out of it, which should be some compensation don'y you think?'.

'A racialist future, but not neccesarily'. That's a cry to rally the troops next time around time don't you think? Oh yes, there will be a next time.

How odd you should insist 'we are not all the same'. And if as you beleive 'we' are all different, how *ideally* do you think these differences you are so keen on, manifest themselves politically?

Different estates for a start presumably? Then different schools. Obviously. State supported. Of course. Different forms of law enforcement? Be nice. Different political parties? A natural development.

But then why not just go the whole hog and insist - on - different fucking countries?!

Back to discussion page                    RA home page